Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14700F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10105F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10105F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-14700F is 1028 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-10105F.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-14700F
- Performs up to 12% better in Crysis 3 Remastered than Core i3-10105F - 203 vs 182 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105F - 28 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Up to 78% cheaper than Core i7-14700F - £74.35 vs £343.42
- Up to 76% better value when playing Crysis 3 Remastered than Core i7-14700F - £0.41 vs £1.69 per FPS
Crysis 3 Remastered
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
203
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.69/FPS
24%
Price, £
£343.42
21%
FPS Winner
Buy for £343.42 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3207 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
182
89%
Value, £/FPS
£0.41/FPS
100%
Price, £
£74.35
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £74.35 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3403 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-14700F | vs | Intel Core i3-10105F |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
20 | Cores | 4 |
28 | Threads | 8 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
5.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |