Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700F outperforms Core i3-7350K on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-13700F is 2192 days newer than Core i3-7350K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700F
- Performs up to 46% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i3-7350K - 541 vs 371 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7350K - 24 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7350K
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-13700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Core i7-13700F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Core i3-7350K
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-13700F | vs | Intel Core i3-7350K |
|---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Raptor Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 2 |
24 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
| 5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| Not Available | TDP | 60 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 21.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
