Buy on Amazon
£128.82
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $359
Availability
MSRP in USD: $359
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700F outperforms Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-13700F is 2682 days newer than Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700F
- Performs up to 7% better in Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Celeron G3900 - 240 vs 224 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 24 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-13700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy’s The Division 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
224
93.33333333333333%
Value, £/FPS
£0.58/FPS
100%
Price, £
£128.82
100%
Value Winner
Intel Celeron G3900 Dual-Core Processor (2 Core, 2.80 GHz)
Buy for £128.82 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1628 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-13700F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
581
21.83389703119128%
Multi-Core
992
6.410339256865913%
Intel Core i7-13700F | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
| Raptor Lake | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 2 |
24 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| Not Available | TDP | 51 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 21.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
