Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-11700KF on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-11700KF is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 1028 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-11700KF.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-11700KF
- Up to 47% cheaper than Core i9-14900F - £274.46 vs £519.36
- Up to 43% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i9-14900F - £1.52 vs £2.65 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 8% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i7-11700KF - 196 vs 181 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-11700KF - 32 vs 16 threads
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
181
92%
Value, £/FPS
£1.52/FPS
100%
Price, £
£274.46
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £274.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 115 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
196
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.65/FPS
57%
Price, £
£519.36
52%
FPS Winner
Buy for £519.36 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 114 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-11700KF | vs | Intel Core i9-14900F |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 24 |
16 | Threads | 32 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
125 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |