Key Differences
In short — Core i7-11700KF outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1840 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1840 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-11700KF is 2511 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1840.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-11700KF
- Performs up to 23% better in Remnant II than Celeron G1840 - 97 vs 79 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Up to 82% cheaper than Core i7-11700KF - £49.95 vs £274.46
- Up to 78% better value when playing Remnant II than Core i7-11700KF - £0.63 vs £2.83 per FPS
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than Intel Core i7-11700KF - 53 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-11700KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Remnant II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
97
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.83/FPS
22%
Price, £
£274.46
18%
FPS Winner
Buy for £274.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 109 minutes ago
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
79
81%
Value, £/FPS
£0.63/FPS
100%
Price, £
£49.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £49.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 108 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-11700KF | vs | Intel Celeron G1840 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 53 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |