Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900K outperforms the cheaper Core i7-11700F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-11700F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900K is 945 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-11700F.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-11700F
- Up to 50% cheaper than Core i9-14900K - £261.16 vs £521.45
- Up to 42% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i9-14900K - £2.18 vs £3.75 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900K
- Performs up to 16% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i7-11700F - 139 vs 120 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-11700F - 32 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-11700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
120
86%
Value, £/FPS
£2.18/FPS
100%
Price, £
£261.16
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £261.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 64 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
139
100%
Value, £/FPS
£3.75/FPS
58%
Price, £
£521.45
50%
FPS Winner
Buy for £521.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 64 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-11700F | vs | Intel Core i9-14900K |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 24 |
16 | Threads | 32 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |