Key Differences
In short — Core i7-11700F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3470 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3470 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-11700F is 3210 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3470.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-11700F
- Performs up to 23% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-3470 - 145 vs 118 FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i5-3470 - 65 vs 77 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3470 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3470
- Up to 76% cheaper than Core i7-11700F - £63.11 vs £261.16
- Up to 71% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-11700F - £0.53 vs £1.8 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-11700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
145
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.8/FPS
29%
Price, £
£261.16
24%
FPS Winner
Buy for £261.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2166 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
FPS
118
81%
Value, £/FPS
£0.53/FPS
100%
Price, £
£63.11
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £63.11 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2166 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-11700F | vs | Intel Core i5-3470 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jun 1st, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 77 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |