Key Differences
In short — Core i7-11700F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10600K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10600K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-11700F is 320 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-10600K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-11700F
- Performs up to 6% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i5-10600K - 143 vs 135 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600K - 65 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600K
- Up to 39% cheaper than Core i7-11700F - £158.88 vs £261.16
- Up to 36% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i7-11700F - £1.18 vs £1.83 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-11700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
143
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.83/FPS
64%
Price, £
£261.16
60%
FPS Winner
Buy for £261.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10970 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
135
94%
Value, £/FPS
£1.18/FPS
100%
Price, £
£158.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £158.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10971 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-11700F | vs | Intel Core i5-10600K |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |