Key Differences
In short — Core i7-11700F outperforms Celeron G1840 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-11700F is 2511 days newer than Celeron G1840.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-11700F
- Performs up to 59% better in Starfield than Celeron G1840 - 70 vs 44 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than Intel Core i7-11700F - 53 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-11700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-11700F
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Celeron G1840
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1840
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Single-Core
505
24.036173250832938%
Multi-Core
854
9.715585893060295%
Intel Core i7-11700F | vs | Intel Celeron G1840 |
|---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
| Rocket Lake | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 65 W | TDP | 53 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 25.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
| No | Overclockable | No |
