Key Differences
In short — Core i7-11375H outperforms Xeon E5-2630 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-11375H is 2317 days newer than Xeon E5-2630 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-11375H
- Performs up to 9% better in Elden Ring than Xeon E5-2630 v3 - 126 vs 116 FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3 - 35 vs 85 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-11375H - 16 vs 8 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Core i7-11375H
Mobile • Jan 11th, 2021
Xeon E5-2630 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-11375H | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 11th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Tiger Lake | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel BGA 1449 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 16 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 85 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
Iris XE 96EU | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
