Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10875H outperforms Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-10875H is 1185 days newer than Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10875H
- Performs up to 11% better in Overwatch 2 than Celeron G3930T - 354 vs 320 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i7-10875H - 35 vs 45 Watts
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Core i7-10875H
Mobile • Apr 2nd, 2020
Celeron G3930T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-10875H | vs | Intel Celeron G3930T |
|---|---|---|
Apr 2nd, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| 5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 45 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 23.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| UHD Graphics | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
