Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-8300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-8300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700K is 806 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-8300.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700K
- Performs up to 3% better in F1 22 than Core i3-8300 - 280 vs 273 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8300 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8300
- Up to 20% cheaper than Core i7-10700K - £188.88 vs £235.0
- Up to 18% better value when playing F1 22 than Core i7-10700K - £0.69 vs £0.84 per FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700K - 62 vs 125 Watts
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for £235 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 60 minutes ago
Desktop • Feb 14th, 2018
FPS
273
97%
Value, £/FPS
£0.69/FPS
100%
Price, £
£188.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £188.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 60 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Feb 14th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-10700K | vs | Intel Core i3-8300 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Feb 14th, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 62 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |