Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms Ryzen 3 2200G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 808 days newer than Ryzen 3 2200G.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 5% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Ryzen 3 2200G - 208 vs 198 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 2200G - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
208
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.05/FPS
100%
Price, £
£218.66
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £218.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 234 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Single-Core
997
61.848635235732004%
Multi-Core
2858
39.52427050200525%
Intel Core i7-10700F | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 2200G |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Feb 12th, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raven Ridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |