Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700 is 973 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700
- Performs up to 6% better in Far Cry 5 than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 214 vs 202 FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Up to 29% cheaper than Core i7-10700 - £163.79 vs £231.89
- Up to 25% better value when playing Far Cry 5 than Core i7-10700 - £0.81 vs £1.08 per FPS
Far Cry 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
214
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.08/FPS
75%
Price, £
£231.89
70%
FPS Winner
Buy for £231.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
202
94%
Value, £/FPS
£0.81/FPS
100%
Price, £
£163.79
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £163.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-10700 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Comet Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 16 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |