Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9600KF outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-9600KF is 735 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9600KF
- Performs up to 14% better in Valorant than Celeron G3930 - 796 vs 697 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 6 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Up to 78% cheaper than Core i5-9600KF - £44.99 vs £208.66
- Up to 77% better value when playing Valorant than Core i5-9600KF - £0.06 vs £0.26 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-9600KF - 51 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
796
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.26/FPS
23.076923076923077%
Price, £
£208.66
21%
FPS Winner
Buy for £208.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 37 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
697
87.56281407035176%
Value, £/FPS
£0.06/FPS
100%
Price, £
£44.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £44.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 34 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
608
38.311279143037176%
Multi-Core
1043
18.275801647100053%
Intel Core i5-9600KF | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 2 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |