Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-9600KF outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 7 1700 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-9600KF is 677 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 7 1700.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9600KF
- Performs up to 9% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Ryzen 7 1700 - 135 vs 124 FPS
- Up to 3% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Ryzen 7 1700 - £1.55 vs £1.59 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 1700
- Up to 6% cheaper than Core i5-9600KF - £196.62 vs £208.66
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i5-9600KF - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9600KF - 16 vs 6 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
135
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.55/FPS
100%
Price, £
£208.66
94%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £208.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1628 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
FPS
124
91.85185185185185%
Value, £/FPS
£1.59/FPS
97.48427672955975%
Price, £
£196.62
100%
Buy for £196.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1628 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
Single-Core
1005
63.32703213610586%
Multi-Core
5100
89.36393902225336%
Intel Core i5-9600KF | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 1700 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Mar 2nd, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
6 | Threads | 16 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |