Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9600K outperforms Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-9600K is 2146 days newer than Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9600K
- Performs up to 7% better in Dead Space than Celeron G1610 - 154 vs 144 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 6 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Core i5-9600K - 55 vs 95 Watts
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £5.56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74784 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
24.88317757009346%
Multi-Core
739
11.425479282622138%
Intel Core i5-9600K | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 2 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
UHD 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
Yes | Overclockable | No |