Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9600 outperforms Core i3-7100T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-9600 is 654 days newer than Core i3-7100T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9600
- Performs up to 5% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i3-7100T - 132 vs 126 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7100T - 6 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-9600 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
132
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.73/FPS
100%
Price, £
£228.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £228.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 61 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-9600 | vs | Intel Core i3-7100T |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 4 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |