Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 5700X3D outperforms Core i5-9400T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 5700X3D is 1955 days newer than Core i5-9400T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400T
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D - 35 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D
- Performs up to 14% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i5-9400T - 116 vs 102 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400T - 16 vs 6 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
116
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.07/FPS
100%
Price, £
£239.56
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £239.56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 337 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-9400T | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Not Available |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
6 | Threads | 16 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
UHD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |