Buy on Amazon
£98.66
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $122
Availability
MSRP in USD: $122
No items available
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9400F outperforms Core i3-9100T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-9400F is 129 days newer than Core i3-9100T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Performs up to 2% better in Ready or Not than Core i3-9100T - 266 vs 260 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100T - 6 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-9400F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Core i5-9400F
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
266
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.37/FPS
100%
Price, £
£98.66
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i5-9400F 2.9GHz LGA1151 9M Cache BOX CPU
Buy for £98.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1585 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Core i5-9400F
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Core i3-9100T
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-9100T
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
Single-Core
1203
87.30043541364296%
Multi-Core
3178
65.74265618535374%
Intel Core i5-9400F | vs | Intel Core i3-9100T |
|---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2018 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 65 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 29.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
