Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX outperforms the cheaper Core i5-9400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-9400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX is 553 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-9400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Up to 96% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - £98.66 vs £2378.05
- Up to 96% better value when playing Monster Hunter: World than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - £0.38 vs £9.15 per FPS
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - 65 vs 280 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
- Performs up to 1% better in Monster Hunter: World than Core i5-9400F - 260 vs 257 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400F - 64 vs 6 threads
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
257
98.84615384615385%
Value, £/FPS
£0.38/FPS
100%
Price, £
£98.66
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £98.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3701 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
260
100%
Value, £/FPS
£9.15/FPS
4.1530054644808745%
Price, £
£2378.05
4%
FPS Winner
Buy for £2,378.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3701 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Single-Core
1378
83.26283987915409%
Multi-Core
4834
33.15728102064613%
Intel Core i5-9400F | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Jul 14th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket WRX8 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 32 |
6 | Threads | 64 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 280 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |