Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX outperforms the cheaper Core i5-9400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-9400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX is 553 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-9400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Up to 94% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - £68.89 vs £1179.39
- Up to 93% better value when playing F1 23 than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - £0.32 vs £4.91 per FPS
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - 65 vs 280 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
- Performs up to 10% better in F1 23 than Core i5-9400F - 240 vs 218 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400F - 32 vs 6 threads
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
218
90%
Value, £/FPS
£0.32/FPS
100%
Price, £
£68.89
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £68.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 133 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
240
100%
Value, £/FPS
£4.91/FPS
6%
Price, £
£1179.39
5%
FPS Winner
Buy for £1,179.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 133 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-9400F | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Jul 14th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket WRX8 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 16 |
6 | Threads | 32 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 280 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |