Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9400F outperforms the cheaper FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-9400F is 2080 days newer than the cheaper FX-6350.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Performs up to 14% better in Alan Wake 2 than FX-6350 - 113 vs 99 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Up to 63% cheaper than Core i5-9400F - £39.99 vs £108.88
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for £108.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 78114 minutes ago
Buy for £39.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 78113 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-9400F | vs | AMD FX-6350 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
6 | Threads | 6 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |