Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G outperforms the cheaper Core i5-9400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-9400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G is 641 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-9400.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400
- Up to 14% cheaper than Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G - £148.66 vs £172.38
- Up to 13% better value when playing Mass Effect: Andromeda than Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G - £0.69 vs £0.79 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G
- Performs up to 0% better in Mass Effect: Andromeda than Core i5-9400 - 217 vs 216 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400 - 8 vs 6 threads
Mass Effect: Andromeda
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
216
99.53917050691244%
Value, £/FPS
£0.69/FPS
100%
Price, £
£148.66
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £148.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1662 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2020
FPS
217
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.79/FPS
87.34177215189872%
Price, £
£172.38
86%
FPS Winner
Buy for £172.38 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1661 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-9400 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Not Available |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 8 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
UHD 630 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 6 |
No | Overclockable | No |