Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9400 outperforms the cheaper FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-9400 is 1999 days newer than the cheaper FX-6350.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400
- Performs up to 32% better in Starfield than FX-6350 - 58 vs 44 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Up to 73% cheaper than Core i5-9400 - £39.99 vs £150.64
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £150.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75405 minutes ago
Buy for £39.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75404 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-9400 | vs | AMD FX-6350 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
6 | Threads | 6 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
UHD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |