Buy on Amazon
£121.24
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-8600K outperforms the cheaper Pentium G4400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G4400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-8600K is 765 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G4400.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8600K
- Performs up to 11% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Pentium G4400 - 134 vs 121 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G4400 - 6 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G4400
- Up to 16% cheaper than Core i5-8600K - £101.7 vs £121.24
- Up to 7% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i5-8600K - £0.84 vs £0.9 per FPS
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than Intel Core i5-8600K - 54 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-8600K doesn't have integrated graphics
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-8600K
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
134
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.9/FPS
93.33333333333333%
Price, £
£121.24
83%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i5-8600K Retail - (1151/Hex Core/3.60GHz/9MB/Coffee Lake/95W/Graphics)
Buy for £121.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1695 minutes ago
Pentium G4400
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
121
90.29850746268657%
Value, £/FPS
£0.84/FPS
100%
Price, £
£101.7
100%
Value Winner
Intel Pentium Dual-Core G4400 3.3 GHz Processor CPU
Buy for £101.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1694 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-8600K
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Pentium G4400
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Pentium G4400
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
694
44.89003880983182%
Multi-Core
1184
21.154189744505985%
Intel Core i5-8600K | vs | Intel Pentium G4400 |
|---|---|---|
Oct 5th, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Pentium |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| 4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 95 W | TDP | 54 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
