Key Differences
In short — Core i5-8400 outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-8400 is 56 days newer than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8400
- Performs up to 1% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 204 vs 201 FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 65 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-8400 - 32 vs 6 threads
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
204
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.72/FPS
100%
Price, £
£146.66
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £146.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 346 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Single-Core
1171
86.54841093865484%
Multi-Core
7539
100%
Intel Core i5-8400 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
---|---|---|
Oct 5th, 2017 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 16 |
6 | Threads | 32 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |