Buy on Amazon
£138.66
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $329
Availability
MSRP in USD: $329
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-7640X outperforms the more expensive Ryzen 7 1700 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-7640X is 116 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen 7 1700.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7640X
- Performs up to 22% better in HITMAN 2 than Ryzen 7 1700 - 158 vs 129 FPS
- Up to 29% cheaper than Ryzen 7 1700 - £138.66 vs £196.62
- Up to 42% better value when playing HITMAN 2 than Ryzen 7 1700 - £0.88 vs £1.52 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 1700
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Core i5-7640X - 65 vs 112 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7640X - 16 vs 4 threads
HITMAN 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-7640X
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
FPS
158
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.88/FPS
100%
Price, £
£138.66
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i5-7640X 4.00 GHz LGA 2066 CPU Box - Black
Buy for £138.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3682 minutes ago
Ryzen 7 1700
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
FPS
129
81.64556962025317%
Value, £/FPS
£1.52/FPS
57.89473684210527%
Price, £
£196.62
70%
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 Processor with Wraith Spire RGB LED Cooler - YD1700BBAEBOX
Buy for £196.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3684 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-7640X
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
Ryzen 7 1700
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 7 1700
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
Single-Core
1005
57.06984667802385%
Multi-Core
5100
96.6824644549763%
Intel Core i5-7640X | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 1700 |
|---|---|---|
Jun 26th, 2017 | Release Date | Mar 2nd, 2017 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Summit Ridge |
| Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 16 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 112 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
