Key Differences
In short — Core i5-7640X outperforms FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-7640X is 1519 days newer than FX-6350.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7640X
- Performs up to 13% better in Elden Ring than FX-6350 - 125 vs 111 FPS
- Consumes up to 10% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 112 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7640X - 6 vs 4 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for £49.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 47 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-7640X | vs | AMD FX-6350 |
---|---|---|
Jun 26th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
112 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |