Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms the cheaper Core i5-7600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-7600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 2200 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-7600.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7600
- Up to 88% cheaper than Core i9-13900KS - £76.66 vs £640.28
- Up to 87% better value when playing Battlefield 1 than Core i9-13900KS - £0.32 vs £2.42 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 65 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 10% better in Battlefield 1 than Core i5-7600 - 265 vs 242 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7600 - 32 vs 4 threads
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
242
91%
Value, £/FPS
£0.32/FPS
100%
Price, £
£76.66
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £76.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3402 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
FPS
265
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.42/FPS
13%
Price, £
£640.28
11%
FPS Winner
Buy for £640.28 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3401 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-7600 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KS |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 12th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 150 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |