Buy on Amazon
£156.91
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-7500T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-7500T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600 is 1533 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-7500T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7500T
- Up to 34% cheaper than Core i5-11600 - £156.91 vs £237.41
- Up to 7% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Mirage than Core i5-11600 - £1.74 vs £1.87 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600 - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600
- Performs up to 41% better in Assassin's Creed Mirage than Core i5-7500T - 127 vs 90 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7500T - 12 vs 4 threads
Assassin's Creed Mirage
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Core i5-7500T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
90
70%
Value, £/FPS
£1.74/FPS
100%
Price, £
£156.91
100%
Value Winner
Intel BX80677I57500T 7th Generation Intel Core i5-7500T Processor
Buy for £156.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 43 minutes ago
Core i5-11600
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
127
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.87/FPS
93%
Price, £
£237.41
66%
FPS Winner
Intel® Core™ i5-11600 Desktop Processor 6 Cores up to 4.8 GHz LGA1200 (Intel® 500 Series & select 400 Series chipset) 65W
Buy for £237.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 43 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Core i5-7500T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Core i5-11600
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-7500T | vs | Intel Core i5-11600 |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 4 | Threads | 12 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 27.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
