Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-7400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-7400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900K is 2093 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-7400.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7400
- Up to 67% cheaper than Core i9-13900K - £165.02 vs £495.49
- Up to 46% better value when playing F1 23 than Core i9-13900K - £0.81 vs £1.5 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900K
- Performs up to 63% better in F1 23 than Core i5-7400 - 331 vs 203 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7400 - 32 vs 4 threads
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
203
61%
Value, £/FPS
£0.81/FPS
100%
Price, £
£165.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £165.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 28 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
331
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.5/FPS
54%
Price, £
£495.49
33%
FPS Winner
Buy for £495.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 27 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-7400 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900K |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |