Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1650 v4 outperforms Core i5-7300HQ on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1650 v4 is 197 days older than Core i5-7300HQ.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7300HQ
- Consumes up to 68% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 45 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
- Performs up to 18% better in Cities: Skylines II than Core i5-7300HQ - 20 vs 17 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7300HQ - 12 vs 4 threads
Cities: Skylines II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i5-7300HQ
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2017
Xeon E5-1650 v4
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-7300HQ | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
| Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 4 | Threads | 12 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 140 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 25.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
