Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700F outperforms Core i5-6600T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-9700F is 1391 days newer than Core i5-6600T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6600T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i7-9700F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-9700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700F
- Performs up to 4% better in Battlefield IV than Core i5-6600T - 421 vs 404 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-6600T - 8 vs 4 threads
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
421
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.78/FPS
100%
Price, £
£328.66
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £328.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1884 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Single-Core
1181
76.24273724983861%
Multi-Core
3223
51.51854219948849%
Intel Core i5-6600T | vs | Intel Core i7-9700F |
---|---|---|
Jul 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Skylake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
UHD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |