Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3100 outperforms Core i5-6600T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 3100 is 1758 days newer than Core i5-6600T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6600T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 3100 - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 3100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3100
- Performs up to 3% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-6600T - 188 vs 183 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-6600T - 8 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
FPS
188
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.38/FPS
100%
Price, £
£71.76
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £71.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 62483 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Single-Core
1181
79.85125084516565%
Multi-Core
3223
63.432395197795714%
Intel Core i5-6600T | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3100 |
---|---|---|
Jul 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 24th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Skylake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |