Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms the cheaper Core i5-6600K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-6600K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 2751 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-6600K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6600K
- Up to 74% cheaper than Core i9-13900KS - £138.88 vs £533.99
- Up to 71% better value when playing Rocket League than Core i9-13900KS - £0.19 vs £0.65 per FPS
- Consumes up to 39% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 91 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 14% better in Rocket League than Core i5-6600K - 818 vs 717 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-6600K - 32 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-6600K doesn't have integrated graphics
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
FPS
717
87%
Value, £/FPS
£0.19/FPS
100%
Price, £
£138.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £138.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 78 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
FPS
818
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.65/FPS
29%
Price, £
£533.99
26%
FPS Winner
Buy for £533.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-6600K | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KS |
---|---|---|
Jul 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 12th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Skylake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
91 W | TDP | 150 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |