Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-6600K outperforms the more expensive Core i5-7400 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-6600K is 551 days older than the more expensive Core i5-7400.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6600K
- Performs up to 4% better in Remnant II than Core i5-7400 - 88 vs 85 FPS
- Up to 30% cheaper than Core i5-7400 - £106.66 vs £152.25
- Up to 32% better value when playing Remnant II than Core i5-7400 - £1.21 vs £1.79 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7400
- Consumes up to 29% less energy than Intel Core i5-6600K - 65 vs 91 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-6600K doesn't have integrated graphics
Remnant II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
FPS
88
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.21/FPS
100%
Price, £
£106.66
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £106.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3714 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
85
96.5909090909091%
Value, £/FPS
£1.79/FPS
67.59776536312849%
Price, £
£152.25
70%
Buy for £152.25 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3715 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
1176
82.8752642706131%
Multi-Core
3232
80.55832502492522%
Intel Core i5-6600K | vs | Intel Core i5-7400 |
---|---|---|
Jul 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Skylake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
91 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |