Key Differences
In short — Core i5-6600K outperforms Core i3-4170 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-6600K is 427 days newer than Core i3-4170.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6600K
- Performs up to 6% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i3-4170 - 107 vs 101 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4170
- Consumes up to 41% less energy than Intel Core i5-6600K - 54 vs 91 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-6600K doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
FPS
107
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1/FPS
100%
Price, £
£106.66
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £106.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 90 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Single-Core
1101
77.58985200845666%
Multi-Core
2130
53.090727816550356%
Intel Core i5-6600K | vs | Intel Core i3-4170 |
---|---|---|
Jul 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Skylake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
91 W | TDP | 54 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |