Key Differences
In short — Core i5-6500 outperforms FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-6500 is 794 days newer than FX-6350.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6500
- Performs up to 9% better in Battlefield IV than FX-6350 - 404 vs 372 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-6500 - 6 vs 4 threads
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
FPS
372
92.07920792079209%
Value, £/FPS
£0.11/FPS
100%
Price, £
£39.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £39.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-6500 | vs | AMD FX-6350 |
---|---|---|
Jul 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Skylake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |