Key Differences
In short — Core i5-6400 outperforms Xeon E5-2680 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-6400 is 297 days newer than Xeon E5-2680 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6400
- Performs up to 4% better in Dirt 5 than Xeon E5-2680 v3 - 168 vs 162 FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 - 65 vs 120 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-6400 - 24 vs 4 threads
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Core i5-6400
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Xeon E5-2680 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-6400 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 |
|---|---|---|
Jul 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Skylake | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| 4 | Cores | 12 |
| 4 | Threads | 24 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 120 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
