Key Differences
In short — Core i5-5675C outperforms FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-5675C is 1311 days newer than FX-6100.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-5675C
- Performs up to 14% better in Ready or Not than FX-6100 - 264 vs 231 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-6100 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-5675C - 6 vs 4 threads
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Core i5-5675C
Desktop • May 15th, 2015
FX-6100
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-5675C | vs | AMD FX-6100 |
|---|---|---|
May 15th, 2015 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
| Core i5 | Collection | FX |
| Broadwell | Codename | Zambezi |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 4 | Threads | 6 |
| 3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
