Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2620 v3 outperforms Core i5-5350U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2620 v3 is 174 days older than Core i5-5350U.
Advantages of Core i5-5350U
- Consumes up to 82% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 15 vs 85 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Xeon E5-2620 v3
- Performs up to 0% better in Battlefield 1 than Core i5-5350U - 236 vs 235 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-5350U - 12 vs 4 threads
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-5350U
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
Xeon E5-2620 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-5350U | vs | Xeon E5-2620 v3 |
|---|---|---|
Mar 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Broadwell | Codename | Haswell-E |
| Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 4 | Threads | 12 |
| 1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
| 2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 85 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
Intel HD 6000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
