Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4690 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4690 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 1616 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4690.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4690
- Up to 91% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - £44.99 vs £521.99
- Up to 91% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - £0.35 vs £4.05 per FPS
- Consumes up to 53% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 84 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 2% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-4690 - 129 vs 127 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4690 - 24 vs 4 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
127
98%
Value, £/FPS
£0.35/FPS
100%
Price, £
£44.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £44.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 163 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
129
100%
Value, £/FPS
£4.05/FPS
8%
Price, £
£521.99
8%
FPS Winner
Buy for £521.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 163 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4690 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Haswell | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
84 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |