Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX outperforms Core i5-4590T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX is 2256 days newer than Core i5-4590T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4590T
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - 35 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
- Performs up to 5% better in Deathloop than Core i5-4590T - 181 vs 172 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4590T - 64 vs 4 threads
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
181
100%
Value, £/FPS
£13.14/FPS
100%
Price, £
£2378.05
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £2,378.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 35922 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 11th, 2014
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 11th, 2014
Single-Core
916
55.34743202416919%
Multi-Core
2544
17.44975649907401%
Intel Core i5-4590T | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX |
---|---|---|
May 11th, 2014 | Release Date | Jul 14th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Haswell | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket WRX8 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 32 |
4 | Threads | 64 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 280 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |