Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105F outperforms Core i5-4460T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10105F is 2572 days newer than Core i5-4460T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4460T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i3-10105F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-10105F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Performs up to 11% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i5-4460T - 206 vs 186 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4460T - 8 vs 4 threads
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
206
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.37/FPS
100%
Price, £
£77.03
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £77.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58173 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Mar 1st, 2014
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Mar 1st, 2014
Single-Core
802
55.15818431911968%
Multi-Core
2190
48.971377459749554%
Intel Core i5-4460T | vs | Intel Core i3-10105F |
---|---|---|
Mar 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
1.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
2.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |