Key Differences
In short — Core i5-4460 outperforms Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-4460 is 524 days newer than Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4460
- Performs up to 4% better in Baldur's Gate 3 than Celeron G1620 - 113 vs 109 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Consumes up to 35% less energy than Intel Core i5-4460 - 55 vs 84 Watts
Baldur's Gate 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-4460
Desktop • May 11th, 2014
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
409
38.91531874405329%
Multi-Core
723
24.692622950819672%
Intel Core i5-4460 | vs | Intel Celeron G1620 |
|---|---|---|
May 11th, 2014 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
| Haswell | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| 3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 84 W | TDP | 55 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
| No | Overclockable | No |
