Key Differences
In short — Core i3-530 outperforms Core i5-430M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-530 and Core i5-430M have been released at the same time.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-430M
- Consumes up to 52% less energy than Intel Core i3-530 - 35 vs 73 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-530
- Performs up to 1% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Core i5-430M - 116 vs 115 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-430M doesn't have integrated graphics
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Core i5-430M
Mobile • Jan 7th, 2010
Core i3-530
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-430M | vs | Intel Core i3-530 |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 7th, 2010 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Arrandale | Codename | Clarkdale |
| Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| 2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 73 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
| 17.0x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
| No | Overclockable | No |
