Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3300X outperforms Core i5-4200U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 3300X is 2516 days newer than Core i5-4200U.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4200U
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 3300X - 15 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 3300X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3300X
- Performs up to 28% better in Dirt 5 than Core i5-4200U - 194 vs 151 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4200U - 8 vs 4 threads
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
FPS
194
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.16/FPS
100%
Price, £
£225
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £225 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58291 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Mobile • Jun 4th, 2013
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Mobile • Jun 4th, 2013
Single-Core
721
43.17365269461077%
Multi-Core
1388
23.959951665803555%
Intel Core i5-4200U | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3300X |
---|---|---|
Jun 4th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 24th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Haswell | Codename | Matisse |
Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
1.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
2.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |