Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10850K outperforms Core i5-3475S on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10850K is 2978 days newer than Core i5-3475S.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3475S
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-10850K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10850K
- Performs up to 4% better in Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Core i5-3475S - 220 vs 211 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3475S - 20 vs 4 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
FPS
220
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.34/FPS
100%
Price, £
£295
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £295 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 142 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3475S | vs | Intel Core i9-10850K |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 27th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |