Buy on Amazon
£29
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3470S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3470S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 3210 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3470S.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3470S
- Up to 89% cheaper than Core i5-11600K - £29.0 vs £256.79
- Up to 86% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-11600K - £0.25 vs £1.76 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 25% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-3470S - 146 vs 117 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3470S - 12 vs 4 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Core i5-3470S
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
FPS
117
80.13698630136986%
Value, £/FPS
£0.25/FPS
100%
Price, £
£29
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core i5-3470S - i5-3470S
Buy for £29 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3873 minutes ago
Core i5-11600K
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
146
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.76/FPS
14.204545454545455%
Price, £
£256.79
11%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i5-11600K (3.9 GHz / 4.9 GHz, 12M Cache)
Buy for £256.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3874 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Core i5-3470S
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Core i5-11600K
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-3470S
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Single-Core
604
27.630375114364135%
Multi-Core
1724
20.095582235691804%
Intel Core i5-3470S | vs | Intel Core i5-11600K |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Rocket Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 4 | Threads | 12 |
| 2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 29.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
| Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
